Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" Results 21 - 40 of 59,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
“Should a city like Honolulu be able to set energy policy for the rest of the United States? [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm by Sofya Asatryan
Whether TT is entitled to reasonable royalties from IBG because it made the accused product in the United States even though they were used by customers overseas. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
On May 7, 2024, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Defendant ISP Environmental Service Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm by Josh Blackman
[President Biden invokes Section 212(f) of the INA to block asylum seekers from entering the United States.] [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
He should not be seeking to stop people from coming to the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:09 pm by David Klein
Readers of our blog may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”) lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:44 pm by William Sinclair and Meredith McKinnon
Russell III of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granted plaintiff’s motion to remand its putative class action to state court. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:57 am by admin
First, the PWFA uses similar language to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), stating that a qualified employee is one who “with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:26 am by Lawrence Solum
Since Everson, however, the Court has disavowed the wall metaphor because it does not adequately reflect the normal and nuanced relationship between religion and government in the United States. [read post]
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]