Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Attorney’s Fees in a Copyright Action« Win One for the Gipper »  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-1157 Just as famous as some great upsets in sports history are the motivational speeches that inspired them. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:47 am by Gene Quinn
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the district court has broad discretion to award attorneys’ fees under Section 285 of Title 35 of the United States Code. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm by Christian Stegmaier
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm by Christian Stegmaier
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
To understand why the plaintiffs won—and why the district court did not think it was even a close or difficult case—we must take a trip down memory lane and review the US Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence.The Constitutional Right to Seek an Abortion: From Roe to Casey to Carhart to Whole Woman’s HealthThe history of abortion access in the United States has not been linear. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:25 am by Francis Pileggi
  Contrary to El Paso, in this case the forum selection clause was broader than the one in the El Paso case and enforceable as to legal and equitable claims because the parties submitted “‘to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state court within New Castle County, Delaware or, if it can obtain jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware sitting in Wilmington, Delaware . . . with… [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by cdw
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by William C. Martinez
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by William C. Martinez
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]