Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Attorney’s Fees in a Copyright Action« Win One for the Gipper »  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-1157 Just as famous as some great upsets in sports history are the motivational speeches that inspired them. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It makes good use of Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Castle Rock v. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied White Castle’s motion, ruling that each post-enactment scan or disclosure of Ms. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia permit minors to consent to contraceptive services on their own behalf, and another twenty-four states permit them to consent in at least some circumstances. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court narrowed the scope of the contraceptive mandate in Burwell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by skelly
Equitas Insurance Limited (EIL), No. 17-CV-6850-LTS-SLC, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, ICSOP issued an umbrella liability insurance policy to Castle & Cook, Inc. [read post]
Rural/Metro: The Supreme Court Meant What It SaidThe district court granted summary judgment to Rural. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
  The district court issued a second TRO for that class of women—which the Fifth Circuit again vacated the next day. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois took action last week to protect the public, issuing General Order No. 20-0012 entitled IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY (bold and all caps in original). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]