Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VEHICLE(S)" Results 21 - 40 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Will McAllister
Ill (August 4, 2011), the United States District Court granted Bank of America and LaSalle Bank’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:24 am
The United States District Court granted summary judgment for both defendants.On June 8, 2004, plaintiff purchased a tractor manufactured by defendant CNH. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the officers did not need a warrant to search the Oldsmobile, concluding that it is “not practical to secure a warrant, because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
Mazda Motor of America, Inc., (Supreme Court, February 23, 2011) --- S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
I keep telling you this, and it bears repeating--this is the United States of America. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:43 am
 After the Court of Appeals concluded in that case, DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
  Plaintiffs opposed NILT's motion on two grounds: (1) that the Graves Amendment did not apply because NILT neither itself leased the Turco vehicle nor is in the business of leasing vehicles; and (2) that the Graves Amendment violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
According to the National Safety Council, over 2.5 million rear end collisions are reported every year in the United States, making them the most common type of automobile accident. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Opponents of cell phone tower"  tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Opponents of cell phone tower"  tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:19 am by John Day
    Nissan also argued that   the Appellants’ evidence was concentrated in two areas: showing that advanced back-up aids were used in some Nissan vehicles marketed outside the United States and statistics showing the number of injuries in backing collisions. [read post]