Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 2:28 am
John L Productions, Johnny Williams, D2010-0359 (WIPO April 23, 2010). [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:47 pm
John Does (1-10) et al., 2020 WL 6042289 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 11:01 pm
After the unknown infringer’s domain name registrar (the case does not say whether it was also the web host) refused to take down the allegedly infringing content, plaintiff filed suit against the “John Doe” defendant. [read post]
3 May 2019, 11:27 am
In the subject case, the plaintiff failed to file his initial complaint within the one-year statute of limitations and did not name John Doe as a defendant as required under the Tennessee code. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:11 pm
brought suit in the Western District against “John Does 1-217” for alleged cybersquatting, trademark infringement, and other trademark related causes of action. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
The initial complaint, filed on January 31, 2020, named “John Doe, M.D. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm
The plaintiff did not name the other unknown driver in the lawsuit (usually done by indicating “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”), but the defendant asserted a third-party negligence claim against that motorist (with cross-claims for indemnity and contribution from any co-defendants) and demanded fault allocations against any defendants that might settle prior to the trial. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm
The plaintiff did not name the other unknown driver in the lawsuit (usually done by indicating “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”), but the defendant asserted a third-party negligence claim against that motorist (with cross-claims for indemnity and contribution from any co-defendants) and demanded fault allocations against any defendants that might settle prior to the trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe and Jane Doe, 2014 FC 161, provides insight into the collision of Norwich Orders, means used to identify unknown infringers, and the growing business model of copyright trolls giving rise for the Courts to be more mindful of playing a role in potentially abusive behaviour of the trolls. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:22 pm
John Doe and John Botson, 2012 WL 4747170 (N.D. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
[Doe]‘s mental status is unknown. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm
A remedy of vacatur, under that name or called setting aside, was unknown to the drafters of the APA and to experts in administrative law for two decades thereafter. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:59 am
A medical malpractice case ensued, wherein Dulin and his wife sued the Center and 17 fictitiously named defendants (John Doe, Jane Doe, these are placeholders a plaintiff's attorney may use when filing a lawsuit in cases where the identities of the defendants -- in this case, doctors, nurses and hospital staff -- are unknown or unconfirmed). [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 1:16 pm
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this brain injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:28 pm
Thus, the John Doe summons is perfectly tailored to the IRS’s effort to identify account holders in cases such as offshore bank accounts or virtual currencies where there is “anonymity and a lack of third-party reporting,” as it allows the IRS to seek information on an entire class of taxpayers whose identities are unknown. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Tracfone filed a John Doe complaint against unknown defendants supposedly engaged in “an illegal scheme relating to the sale of TracFone mobile telephone airtime. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
The copyright owner files suit in district court against John/Jane Doe, and asks the Court for leave to serve early discovery, namely a subpoena to the ISP trying to determine the identity associated with the IP address on the day(s) of the purported infringement. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
., court-ordered electronic surveillance) to name just a few. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents or 42 U.S.C. [read post]
