Search for: "US Inventor v. Vidal" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
On 20 December 2023, the UK Supreme Court handed down its highly anticipated judgment in the case of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks [2023] UKSC 49, unanimously ruling that only a natural person can be named as an inventor on a patent application. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by USPTO
Therefore, the USPTO is not, at this time, implementing any new requirement to disclose the use of AI, beyond that which is required in rare circumstances by USPTO rules.The USPTO will continue to presume that the named inventor(s) in an application are the actual inventor(s). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfOn Monday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the amusing little case of Vidal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
  For me, the case is largely about the strong presumption that the listed inventors are correct. [read post]
Vidal that only natural persons can be inventors, and therefore, AI cannot be named as an inventor in a patent application. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2010) (SCT “directed us to construe the scope of analogous art broadly”); Airbus S.A.S. v. [read post]