Search for: "US v. Alan Little" Results 21 - 40 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 The argument against such business is pretty well established, as Paul Alan Levy and I had the experience of arguing together a little while back. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
Alan Latman, going all the way back to his seminal 1958 study on fair use as part of the Copyright Law Revision process leading to the current Act, wrote: Practical necessity is at times the rationale of fair use. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:50 am
Both marks were in use in the fashion/designer goods market. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 pm by INFORRM
While Rusbridger was very concerned by the recent anonymisation of the parties in a libel case (ZAM v CFW), he was more reluctant to criticise the contra mundum order in OPQ v BJM and CJM. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
” And then there’s New York v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Also late last week, the same judge scheduled a hearing in Murtagh v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
No – at least if the Supreme Court accepts that Government’s position in Zivotosfky v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:26 am by BakerHostetler
Authors: Gonzalo Zeballos, James Sherer, and Alan Pate Asian Data Privacy Updates  1. [read post]
It is therefore the most appropriate measure for antitrust law generally, and it is especially useful in two-sided markets, where asymmetrical price changes are of little use in determining anticompetitive effects. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:20 am by Howard Wasserman
Reformist eyes often turn to the medical school model of two years of classroom learning, two years of entirely clinical learning (with little or no classroom component), and an apprenticeship of internship/residency. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]