Search for: "US v. Antonio Battle" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In Charles I of Spain (later the most Catholic Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V), Magellan found a willing patron. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Tim Springer
A claimant’s impairment is “severe” if it meets the standard of Stone v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
By Richard Cooper, Luke Barefoot, Adam Brenneman and Antonio Pietrantoni1 If there is one thing that all stakeholders in Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis can agree on (and there are likely not many such things), it is that, without real economic growth, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico will neither be able to repay its creditors nor offer its residents a viable, let alone prosperous, future. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
What's more, "the United States Supreme Court has barred any use of the sixth factor and advised that the second factor generally cannot be used as a ground for enhancing the award. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Events Please let us know if there are any events you would like to be included on this list by email: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
There are some rules to build up a decent discussion though, Jeremy recalls. * The Battle of Trumpton: parody, or protection of kippers? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was the Catholic bishop of San Antonio, Texas, who brought the early RFRA lawsuit to overcome the historic preservation laws of Boerne, Texas, that eventually rendered it unconstitutional in Boerne v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
We are used to the idea of celebrities and government officials being treated as public figures, but should their attorneys fall into that category as well? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
We are used to the idea of celebrities and government officials being treated as public figures, but should their attorneys fall into that category as well? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
We are used to the idea of celebrities and government officials being treated as public figures, but should their attorneys fall into that category as well? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
We are used to the idea of celebrities and government officials being treated as public figures, but should their attorneys fall into that category as well? [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm by Deborah Wald
The most notorious of these cases was Nancy S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The state thus is attempting to turn the new courthouse skirmish over a little-used section of the 1965 law — its Section 3 — into a constitutional battle with high stakes for the future of voting rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  Commencing in 1991, the wealthiest trial bar in the country lost legislative battle after legislative battle designed to destroy the wrongful injury remedies of injured Texans. [read post]