Search for: "US v. Bernard Martin"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Introduction by Deborah Cao; articles by Bernard S. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm
He also gave an interview to the Press Gazette in which he attacked, among others, the Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
This same mechanism of referring to national law (and, if one will, to an international treaty) could be further used in future by the European Parliament and Council in any area where the TFEU nonetheless requires that they themselves set down the appropriate rules, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, for effecting the various tasks assigned to them by that treaty. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:25 pm
Lord Steyn had sat on the judging panel at the House of Lords in the case of Farley v Skinner [2001] – the main case I was about to use to support the first submission of my argument! [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Bernard) (Dee Wallace) 17. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The CAFC, in Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
For lawyers, understanding verbal fillers provides a lesson in how to approach these pesky utterances, which for most of us have come with a lifetime of stern admonishments to avoid using them at all costs. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in Cadwell Estate v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On Monday 12 March 2012 Sharp J gave a brief judgment in the case of British Pregnancy Advisory Service v The person using the alias “Pablo Escobar” – the case relating to the hacking of the claimant’s website ([2012] EWHC 572 (QB)). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Martin K. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Martin, Jr. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
