Search for: "US v. Bob Jones"
Results 21 - 40
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
At the time, none of us knew how to handle this new torrent of a news cycle. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Is that the opinion you want us to write? [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
’”[14]It was not until 1995 and 2008, respectively, that the Southern Baptist Convention and Bob Jones University apologized for their roles in using religious beliefs to uphold racism.[15]The historical record establishes beyond dispute that “the religious argument for segregation . . . was a quite widely held belief. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
“No Bob, that’s not how securities registration exemptions work. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
She wanted to corner the federal government on the Bob Jones question left unresolved in Obergefell. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Justice Samuel Alito asked in the oral argument at Obergefell if Bob Jones would apply to cases involving sexual orientation discrimination:Well, in the Bob Jones case, the Court held that a college was not entitled to taxexempt status if it opposed interracial marriage or interracial dating. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
New Zealand Newshub reports that the libel action brought millionaire Sir Bob Jones’ case against filmmaker Renae Maihi will begin on 10 February 2020 in the High Court in Wellington. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Thus, for instance, in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
United States, 18-6662 Issue: Whether the determination of a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act requires the same categorical approach used in the determination of a “violent felony” under the Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
” Bob Jones University v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Jones and Jon B. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm
Nate Jones and I examine the latest chapters in the now-encyclopedic tale of Silicon Valley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:28 am
Nate Jones and I examine the latest chapters in the now-encyclopedic tale of Silicon Valley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
” Rulings Three rulings have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03737-18 Jones v walesonline.co.uk, Clause 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy) and 12 (discrimination), no breach after investigation. 04100-18 The Transparency Project v Mail Online, Clause 1, no breach after investigation. 04786-18 Hobson v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:29 am
Related Cases: Carreon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
To avoid confusion on the winning party in a case, I used the coding from the Supreme Court Database. [read post]
