Search for: "US v. C Bolt" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Jack Martone
On January 11, the Court heard oral arguments in Roberts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 5:27 pm
Finally, special rules govern the use of the FIFA.COM logo (right), which “may only be used on a website as a hyperlink to the homepage of the official website www.FIFA.com”, and only subject to specific PRIOR approval by FIFA, the IP Manual explains. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Although more often the domain of privacy injunctions, this is by no means unprecedented in the realm of data protection – the CJEU ruling in Joined Cases C-141/12 and C/372/12 YS, M, and S v Minister voor Immigratie in December 2013, concerning three former asylum seekers, is another example. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm by Ann-Therese Schmid
§ 661.7, Appendix A, paragraph (c), is $150,000. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Therefore, many contractors have not yet focused on the nuts and bolts of the all the new transactions that will be required. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:26 pm by Ron
It’s easist for an LPO to “bolt in” to litigation because the process is well-defined. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
The Federal Court decision in Red Label Vacations Inc v 411 Travel Buys Limited 2015 FC 19  has focussed on a detailed considerations by a Canadian court of the issues of copyright and trademark infringement via the use of metatags. [read post]