Search for: "US v. Clarence Thompson" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 2:27 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 1:58 pm by Ilya Somin
Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out that California's position would allow the state to mandate regular access to private property for police or National Guard units that wanted to use it to hold training exercises. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Google Scholar: most cited capital punishment cases - CWRU Law patrons may use Shepard's on Lexis and KeyCite on Westlaw to find additional research resources. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
Thompson stands, such a claim would likely be futile. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Alito, joined by Thomas, also penned a statement regarding the denial of review in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch told Thompson that his request to have the court invalidate the 2012 agreement was a “big one” and “hard for us to swallow. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thompson  (09-571), a 5-4 ruling issued March 29. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Thompson (1881), the Court used that power to hold for the first time that a congressional effort to compel testimony was invalid. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justice Clarence Thomas said of such arguments, in his concurrence in the denial of review in Thompson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 3:49 pm by Ellena Erskine
Johnson said justices appointed by both parties acted in ethical grey areas, but he cited specific concerns about Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to recuse himself in Trump v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
(KQED radio program including commentary from Richard Thompson Ford) When the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Fourteen months after the court declined to block the school from using the new policy, the justices issued their decision in Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]