Search for: "US v. Contreras"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Apex v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Westwood Apex v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:39 pm
Contreras & Metelska v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm
From yesterday's decision in SaveRGV, Sierra Club & Carrizo/Comecrudo Nation of Texas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:14 am
Contreras On June 22, 2022, the Fifth Circuit reissued its opinion in Continental v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:28 am
Contreras University of Utah - S.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
Either one wants to argue that indirectly-imposed costs count, or one doesn't.Expect more posts on FTC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm
This week at the Supremes: Three military cert petitions will likely be on tomorrow’s order list: Huntzinger, No. 10-158, Contreras, No. 10-413, and Ehlers, No. 10-390. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am
Moreover, as Professor Contreras says, it seems un [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:32 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 5:20 am
Lozano v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
Contreras In the latest decision by the UK High Court of Justice (Patents) in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:47 pm
There’s a caricature of US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 4:33 am
Contreras, Associate Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law In a meticulous 207-page opinion released on April 25, Judge James Robart in the Western District of Washington has crafted the first-ever judicial determination of a "reasonable and nondiscriminatory" (RAND) royalty rate for patents essential to industry standards. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
Contreras. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:25 pm
Facts: This case (Contreras et al v. [read post]
