Search for: "US v. Contreras" Results 21 - 40 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Beyoncé received criticism after Kelis, the singer of “Milkshake,” called it theft, suggesting Beyoncé used the song without rights clearance. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Steyn J found that Vardy had used her agent Caroline Watt as an accomplice to leak the posts and that she condoned and actively engaged in the leaks. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
On Mar. 8, an eleventh judge, Rudolph Contreras, said from the bench that he, too, will soon issue a written ruling denying a motion to dismiss that charge. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 7:20 am by Nathan Dorn
Many authors now use the form Honorat Bovet, which was proposed as a correction by French historian and paleographer Gilbert Ouy. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jorge Contreras: Other people did say that there were big changes in ©; that was always his understanding. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
Pledges and Dedications to the Public – has the patent been pledged by its owner for public use (see, e.g., the Open COVID Pledge, which I discuss at length here, subjected to a binding “covenant not to sue” (as was the trademark in Already, LLC v. [read post]
InterDigital v Xiaomi (2020-21) In July 2020, the US tech company InterDigital filed suit against the Chinese consumer electronics maker Xiaomi, claiming infringement of its 3G and 4G patents, as the latter had used its technology without authorisation. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Contreras Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law S.J. [read post]
Judge Rudolph Contreras of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday dismissed a lawsuit from Nevada, Illinois and Virginia that sought government recognition of Virginia’s vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Translational similarity may be a special case where consumers react differently [v. my example of the UNC and University of Wisconsin cases in the US where the PTO said that consumers had stubbornly continued to perceive the marks as indicating a single source despite over 100 years, in the former case, of uncontrolled use]. [read post]