Search for: "US v. Cowley"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Rev. 159-171 (2010).Percival, Robert V. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
App. 2000); Presto v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:22 am
May 21, 2010), reversing a Cowley County conviction for felony obstruction of official duty. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:05 am
Evans-Cowley & Kenneth Pearlman. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
It also makes us feel old, looking at dates like 1988, 1989, and 1991. [read post]
