Search for: "US v. Fabian" Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Register here.NARA transcribes documents from United States of America v. [read post]
This decision was instrumental in the English Court of Appeal’s 2018 ruling in Uber bv v Aslam. [read post]
Dara Khosrowshahi (Uber CEO) argued that three-quarters of current US drivers would be lost if drivers were classified as employees. [read post]
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
We still await the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Uber v Aslam. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 5:41 pm
The latest issue of Archiv des Völkerrechts (Vol. 58, no. 3, 2020) is out. [read post]
 Although no evidence was provided to support this claim, the PTS nevertheless reasoned that the use of Huawei or ZTE telecom equipment in the 5G telecom network may harm Sweden’s security.[1] On 5 November 2020, Huawei filed an appeal with the Stockholm administrative court requesting that the application of the PTS decision be suspended.[2]  In particular, Huawei requested the Swedish administrative authorities to remove the arbitrary conditions prohibiting Huawei from… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Consider the case constantly referred to in decisions this year by courts at both the state and federal level: Jacobson v. [read post]
Moreover, as a subsidiary line of reasoning, the Commission considered that the method used by Ireland to calculate the taxable profits was erroneous. [read post]
(v)   Like many other US FTAs, the US-China trade deal establishes that there should be ‘criminal procedures and penalties’ available for ‘theft, fraud, physical or electronic intrusion and unauthorized or improper use of a computer system’ for trade secret misappropriation (Art. 1.8). [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am by Irene Marchioro (University of Bologna)
The situation is slightly different in the US, where the American Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) also espoused, in addition to frustration, the doctrine of impracticability. [read post]
The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) stands out as one example of how the pooling of union membership resources can be used in ways other than the stereotype of trade unions. [read post]