Search for: "US v. Fitch"
Results 21 - 40
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am
KatFriend Hans Eriksson discussed the issues arising in relation to the application of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)) to a pillow design dispute.OtherPermaKat Eleonora Rosati gave an overview of the approach of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to website blocking under the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) freedom of expression right in Vladimir Kharitonov v Russia.Finally, readers… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am
Nedim analysed a decision from the US Copyright Office Review Board, granting copyright protection to the Abercrombie & Fitch’s Store Front Sculpture, which consists of the letters A and F, the ampersand symbol, and the abbreviation “Co. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 767 F. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:53 am
In a decision issued in June 2020, the US Copyright Office Review Board (CORB) reversed the earlier findings of the US Copyright Office concerning an application to register Abercrombie & Fitch’s Store Front Sculpture. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:01 am
by Dennis Crouch Techtronic Indus. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:52 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc.). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:29 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 765 F.3d 1205 (10th Cir. 2014), U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:19 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 2014 WL 4290589 (10th Cir. 2014): the point is the ability to get to the goods and services, not the way a disabled person gets to them. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
June 25, 2019 - 1 PM: Canal Holdings LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:35 am
Booking.com B.V. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:43 am
” ** Colorado Cross Disability Coal. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
However, an employer “is not required to give precedence to use the facility for religious reasons over use for a business purpose. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
However, an employer “is not required to give precedence to use the facility for religious reasons over use for a business purpose. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
" (Mossoff, at 5) (quoting NGS American, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
Report and Recommendation issued almost a year after oral argument on cross-motions for summary judgment, concludes that Odyssey Education Resources LLC was properly appointed as a Servicer, and should be paid its invoices. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
