Search for: "US v. Floyd" Results 21 - 40 of 818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm by David M. Boertje
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
We use PitchBook to create our dataset of about 150,000 directors of private firms. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Floyd Alexander-Hunt is an LLM candidate at Queen Mary University London and a research assistant at K [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
Using the principles outlined in Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EMLR 21 [100]-[135], the Judge considered three questions relevant to establishing the public interest defence: (1) Was the statement complained of on a matter of public interest, or did it form part of such a statement? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  Judge Lock referred the motion to another judge, James Floyd Ammons, Jr., who denied it. [read post]
Had Hallen been cited at first instance, Sir Christopher Floyd considered that the trial judge may well have reached a different conclusion. [read post]