Search for: "US v. Gallegos" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am by Matt Kaiser
The Fifth Circuit ordered the district court to narrowly interpret certain restrictions that it had imposed on the Appellant’s use of the Internet, holding, for example, that requiring Appellant to secure written permission each time he used the Internet would be unreasonably restrictive. 10. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Jon Sands
Sahagun-Gallegos, No. 13-10095 (Christen with Noonan and Fletcher) ---  The statements of defense counsel during a plea colloquy, with only the defendant's assent, cannot be used in a modified categorical analysis under Descamps v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
In light of the US Supreme Court’s decision this week not to grant review in Iskanian v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 1:09 pm by Eliana Baer
Gallegos: “The law, [sic] is not a primer for social etiquette and should not be used as a sword to wield against every unpleasant encounter or annoying interaction that occurs between household members, spouses, parents, or those who have had a dating relationship. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also, over on LXBN, Anna Gallegos has a piece on Argentina appealing a big bankruptcy case to the Supreme Court, with a potential financial crise hanging in the balance. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm by Jon Sands
Siebert, 542 US 60 (2004). [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff also alleges sufficiently that Curtin mishandled the Gallegos in-house complaint and failed to apprise her of Gallegos's early settlement demand in the amount of $50,000 (see Boglia v Greenberg, 63 AD3d 973, 975 [2009]). [read post]