Search for: "US v. George Fields"
Results 21 - 40
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The article traces the impact of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:17 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 6:27 am
Baldus & George G. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:20 pm
For those who were too young to remember what U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
This Kat was happy to learn that Dr Stewart's DPhil supervisor was his very own internal examiner, Professor George Fleet. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:25 am
How can international watercourses be used in an equitable and reasonable manner? [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Professor Madison, however, suspects an intentional end-run around reverse engineering fair use law by intentionally asserting only state-law contract claims, copying the proceedings in Bowers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Kidd (1868); an early hot-news decision, Kiernan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
On Justia's Verdict today, you can read the second of a two-part series in which I analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Howes v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
Another book award announced at the recent meeting of the ASLH was the Peter Gonville Stein Book Award, "for the best book in legal history written in English" and "sit[ting] outside of the field of US legal history. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
The Society for History in the Federal Government seeks nominations for the Henry Adams Award and George Pendleton Award, book prizes that seek "to encourage excellence in the broad field of US government history. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
This is an inference that is used “during the underlying litigation as a method of evening the playing field where evidence has been hidden or destroyed. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
In Kurns et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:42 pm
Garretson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:29 pm
This field already is used in the Bibliographic Format. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
” See PIABA v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
George S. [read post]
