Search for: "US v. James Poole"
Results 21 - 40
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am
In the case of video standards such as AVC/H.264 the vast majority of SEPs are monetized through patent pooling. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
I confess to being increasingly taken with suggestions that “the Court” might be composed of random selections from a far wider pool of federal judges and, I would add, chief justices of state supreme courts. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am
I remember when candidate Trump, from the debate stage, announced he would appoint a Supreme Court justice who would overrule Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
For the USTR, the condition that one must be a processor to receive an allocation from the reserved pool within the quota and utilize the TRQ is a new condition. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:17 am
"] An interesting decision from two months ago, now on appeal—Barker v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:23 am
Author: James Donald, Candidate Attorney In an April 2021 judgement, the Eastern Cape high court held that a standard form guest indemnity used by a game reserve was not in conflict with applicable provisions in the Consumer Protection Act 2008 (the CPA). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am
This blog was co-authored by James Donald, Candidate Attorney In an April 2021 judgement, the Eastern Cape high court held that a standard form guest indemnity used by a game reserve was not in conflict with applicable provisions in the Consumer Protection Act 2008 (the CPA). [read post]
[Guest post] How much is that SEP in the window? 5 Themes from the IPKat/LSE Nokia v Daimler seminar
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am
They discussed the questions referred in the Nokia v Daimler case, and the broader issues around standards, supply chains and FRAND licensing.The Nokia case (reference C-182/21 at the CJEU) concerned the licensing of a SEP for use in connected cars. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
James is editorial consultant for MARQUES and host of the Talking MARQUES podcast. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 5:14 am
Join us on 21 April at 2PM (London)No Aprils' Fools jokes here. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
That same day the court also decided in Minoru Yasui v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:20 am
” Before Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Furthermore, the complaint named seven relief defendants who received funds from the fraudulent operation for which they had no lawful entitlement (CFTC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
" James Horgan, a former President of IP Federation and assistant managing counsel at Merck Sharp & Dohme, commented that the IP Federation is "better value than any commercial organization. [read post]
