Search for: "US v. John Cordero" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
It included arguments made by Jameel Jaffer, Julian Sanchez, John “Chris” Inglis, and Carrie Cordero. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Supreme Court reached a decision in Bond v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
The French draft is worded carefully to avoid potentially implicating Israel or American service people, and John uses it as a case-study to comment on how the US can make productive use of the ICC without submitting to its jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And after the Supreme Court granted cert in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:45 am by Yishai Schwartz
John analyzed the history of American interpretation of, and adherence to, the UN Headquarters Agreement obligating the US to admit all representatives of UN nations to travel to the UN. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Then after another response from Goodman, John published a further response arguing that the US has never accepted a right to privacy as customary international law and that a change in the US stance on the ICCPR would be bad for Senate ratification of the UN Convention on Persons with Disabilities. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
More on detention: Updating us on Abdullah v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Nick Basciano
John describes the statuses of the detainees at Parwan and gives us some context by comparing the problem to that of Guantanamo. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Lawfare hosted a debate between Carrie Cordero and Steve. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]