Search for: "US v. London"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm
City of New London. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
But New London Mayor Justin Finizio, who previously apologized for the original Kelo condemnations, has proposed devoting the property for a true public use: The 2005 Supreme Court decision in New London v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:14 pm
The abstract: In Kelo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:12 pm
Village of Port Chester is potentially the most important federal public use eminent domain case since Kelo v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:37 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 1220 This appeal considered whether the effect of a Transfer Order, which transferred to Transport for London certain roads in London, was only to transfer the surface of the highway and sufficient sub-soil (normally called the two top spits) as is necessary for the maintenance of the surface, or whether it was to transfer to TfL the entire interest held by the council in the land on which the highway ran. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 4:50 pm
” City of Norwood v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:45 pm
Robin Callender Smith, University of London, Humanities, Social Sciences, and Law, has published The Missing Witness? [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am
Judgment, U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 1:10 pm
Today is the tenth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:50 am
But in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
City of New London Had Gone the Other Way? [read post]
28 Sep 2004, 11:51 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:15 am
City of New London, when the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 ruling that government could use eminent domain to take private property for “economic development…. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 10:01 am
In Superior Water, Light & Power Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
Regina (McDonald) v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2011] UKSC 33; [2011] WLR (D) 218 “A local authority had been entitled to withdraw the funding for a night-time carer to assist a disabled person to use a commode when required, and to instead provide her with incontinence pads to wear at night. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
City of New London. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:05 am
City of New London. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:54 am
We are now in the 20th year of running the very popular Pepper v Hart research course, which the staff at Lincoln’s Inn Library have very kindly agreed to run for us again.Places on the course are limited so please book early to avoid disappointment.Date Thu 26 March 2015Time 10am-4pmLocation Lincoln’s Inn Library, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3TLThis one day course will provide theory and practice in … [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:49 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the decision in which the US Supreme Court held that economic development takings were not per se invalid, has filed a brief amicus curiae supporting the request for review in Goldstein v. [read post]
