Search for: "US v. Mark Bristow"
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
Joe Cohen (Collyer Bristow LLP), who has long taken a keen interest in IP enforcement issues, has treated us to the following news, with some contextual explanation to accompany it. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
I Can you use the Pope's image on T-shirts and gadgets? [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Over on the jiplp weblog newly-promoted Bristows partner Jeremy Blum (well done!) [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
.* Whac-A-Mole Trade Mark Litigation: Using U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Further, if a patent is granted early, it will expire early and the public will gain benefits earlier.The Warner Lambert v Generics case again raised the question of whether a patentee can mark out a field in which he will have protection while undertaking further research. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
One of them was the fact that applicant acted as a licensee using a similar mark for identical goods. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:10 am
Acts include Kilburn & Strode’s The Black IPs, Collyer Bristow’s IP Freely and the Incontinents and Trade Mark Attorney and Youtube sensation Flora Cook. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
in the lovely edifice that is the Blackfriars HQ of law firm Bristows LLP. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Thanks to Bristows patent litigator Vanessa Rieu for the story. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
This was considered by many to be a significantly more formulaic approach than that adopted in other jurisdictions, such as the US. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Part 2 | It may be use, but is it trade mark use? [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
Tom, An associate solicitor at London law firm Bristows, is a dispute resolution specialist with a particular interest in copyright, having cut his teeth on the SAS Institute v World Programming software litigation before the courts of England and Wales and the CJEU. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:12 pm
What can this story teach us about the use of brands in the viral networked world, wonders Neil? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
Bristows' Saaira Gill brings you the latest. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Finally, on IP Tango, Patricia Covarrubia marks the first birthday of Mexico's membership of the Madrid Protocol on international trade mark registration. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
Nicola examines some of its more dystopian predicted effects. * GS Media: IPKat/Bristows rapid response seminar Katfriend Lucie Fortune reports on the rapid response seminar at which Eleonora was joined by Aimee Nisbet, Nicholas Saunders and Theo Savvides on the panel, which was chaired by Mark Brown. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Linking & Copyright rapid response event on 13 September: come join us! [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
