Search for: "US v. Mark Daniel" Results 21 - 40 of 1,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, use of a mark may be “noncommercial” even if used to “sell” a product. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am by Steve Brachmann
Several amici also pushed back on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that VIP Products’ use of Jack Daniel’s marks was noncommercial. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am by Steve Brachmann
Several amici also pushed back on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that VIP Products’ use of Jack Daniel’s marks was noncommercial. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 am by Thomas Key
 Additionally, VIP argued that its use of marks belonging to Jack Daniels constituted nominative fair use, exempt from liability. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald Mann
ShareIt is fair to expect Wednesday’s arguments in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am by Riana Harvey
When considering the global appreciation of the marks from the perspective of the average consumer, including its similarities and its differences, it was highlighted that it was also necessary to take into account the context of use to the extent permitted by the law (as set out in Specsavers v Asda). [read post]
Written by Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:28 am
Following a December 2006 hearing in which experts weighed in with conflicting opinions, state District Court Judge Mark Kent Ellis rejected some of the methods used by Dr. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Scott Daniels (partner in Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian and Practice Center Contributor). [read post]