Search for: "US v. Mark Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
He suggested that the reason why the draftsman did not simply use the words “confidential information” was that, in 1981, the law of confidential information was only rarely applied to personal confidences [47]. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
Does the sale and use of AdWords infringe the rights of brand owners who have registered those words as trade marks in Europe? [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:01 pm
At least one court has found that the addition of a telephone prefix to a generic term does not give rise to an enforceable mark. 800 Spirits Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:49 am
Martens v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
"He signed this quick and dirty because he wants us to go away. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) and I filed an amicus brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:25 am
Jeremy Phillips and Neil Wilkof paid tribute to him. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 1:31 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:58 am
MARK ARMSTRONG v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
It is not necessary, in addition, for the goods at issue to have been the subject, prior to the sale, of an offer for sale or advertising targeting consumers of that State.The Court relied on the earlier Phillips case which the IPKat looked at - not with an entirely happy face - here. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
For example, Phillips possessed two driver's licenses, each with his own photograph, address, and date of birth, but each with a different name: Mark Le Roy Aaron and Mark Edwards Phillips. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
These companies’ pioneering success has recently led to a proliferation of companies that offer similar customization and personalization services, also for watches from more mid-market brands.The customization process, whereby a third party works on the watch and markets and sells the resulting modified watch, including by removing and/or re-applying the original trade mark and adding features not on the original model, raises several IP questions, including questions about trade… [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:39 am
In 2004, this induced the Federal Circuit to grant en banc review of claim its construction jurisprudence in Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jan 2025, 11:13 pm
She provided an update on Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) v Dr Craig Steven Wright, regarding Craig Wright’s authorship battle over the Bitcoin White Paper. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
