Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 21 - 40 of 1,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
” He continued: “One can only contemplate with dread the answer the current Court would have given had it been asked to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
If the mark has been in use for a while you may even be able to get the Examining Attorney to accept a simple declaration stating how long the mark has been in use. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
by Mark Moller In a recent post, Stephen Gardner makes some interesting comments about my recent article, Class Action Lawmaking: An Administrative Law Model. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Two major US Supreme Court patent law decisions were delivered yesterday, while the IPKat was busying himself with trade marks and the copyright gap. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The lead attorneys on the brief are Stephen Poss (attorney of record), Stephen Halbrook, and others. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm by Austin Sarat
Through it all, Justice Stephen Breyer persisted in making the case that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment and “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:37 am by Afro Leo
Monday's #SandtonDiscussion arranged by Lita is lead by Stephen Hollis (@orcagunslinger) and covers the recent appeal court decision in Etraction and the detail over prior use defenses.The case was neatly summarised here by Jeremy Speres who will also be joining the conversation. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
Today marks the 58th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 am
Looking at case law, Neil then outlined misappropriation doctrine: was it an alternative basis for trade mark protection: its locus classicus, the US Supreme Court decision in International News Service v Associated Press has had "a pretty rocky last 90 years", he noted. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 6:48 am
At trial, the government offered evidence that the M/V Tanabata had a removable bypass pipe or "magic pipe" that was used to discharge oily waste without the use of an oily-water separator. [read post]