Search for: "US v. Michael Harris" Results 21 - 40 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:50 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:23 am by Conor McEvily
  At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Dimino predicts that “Jardines should lose,” but that “Harris is a bit tougher. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
Our guests are three employment lawyers: Michael Ketchmark, from Davis Ketchmark & McCreight in Kansas City, Mo.; Jeannie DeVeney from the Overland Park, Kan., office of Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP; and George Lenard, partner with Harris, Dowell, Fisher & Harris in St. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
But I am glad someone is getting us to think about comparative health policy. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But prosecutors from Harris and Bexar counties must have known about Ford and a similar recent case out of the 14th Court of Appeals (Barfield v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Harris, located here: http://www.jthomasblack.com/library/20140707-Vieglelahn-v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
   This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in (among other cases) Harris v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Sixth Circuit used the Justices’ ruling in Scott v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
Newman (1998), 22 E.T.R. (2d) 150 (B.C.S.C.); Mordo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 1:59 pm
Supreme Court announced it would review lethal injection through Baze v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Michael Helfand writes that by asking for the views of the solicitor general last week in Patterson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
Harris Associates and Merck v. [read post]