Search for: "US v. Nancy Rush" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Now Sonnenschein lawyers on both sides of the deal say the rushed integration is going well, resulting in unexpected opportunities and new clients. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
” Although the statute does not use the word “lesser,” state courts have used the phrase “lesser included” to describe the offenses falling within its scope. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. [read post]