Search for: "US v. Newby" Results 21 - 40 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
They are the people who bring us Short Leash Hot Dogs, so no more recommendation needs to be added. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:36 am by steve cornforth blog
I went there because it was a good job and, for a newbie, paid relatively well. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
This civil rights case stems from the shooting death of Michael Newby by Officer McKenzie Mattingly in West Louisville. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
   The next shoe to drop in the area is likely to be the district court's decision in the Enron case (Newby v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
The facts of the dispute mirrored those of a case decided by the Federal Court of Canada in 2012, Bodum USA v Trudeau Corporation (1889) Inc.From arbitrating designs to litigating copyright, the chosen follow-on workshop entitled “Aereo – copyright lessons for the US and beyond” provided an engaging debate surrounding the US Federal Supreme Court’s decision in ABC v Aereo, handed down in June 2014.John Carson Partner (Knobbe Martens,… [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm by Shea Denning
This time, Chief Justice Newby wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Earls dissented. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  But, I have yet to find a good, concise background reader for my nervous con law newbies. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Smith and State v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Newby Foods Ltd) v Food Standards Agency, heard 30 Jan 2019. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In the recent Decision of Parulski v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
” West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943). [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 10:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
We'll run though them all in due course, but first up: a 5-4 decision in State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm by Jamie Markham
Justice Newby authored a dissent, joined by Justice Ervin, which would have concluded under State v. [read post]