Search for: "US v. Rand" Results 21 - 40 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
R4 billion property develpment planned for V&A Several sites at the V&A Waterfront - SA's most valuable piece of real estate - will undergo a multibillion-rand facelift over the next two decades and will boast more luxury hotels, high-end flats and stylish new office blocks. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:45 pm
FRN Arpan Banerjee & Ashwin Murthy, Rand Investments v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  Implementers must be able to use the technology embodied and required in the standards provided they are willing to enter into a FRAND licence. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:09 am by Ted Frank
Add the plaintiff-friendly Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 12:28 am by Sara Moran
Sara MoranThe Court of Appeal allowed ZyXEL’s appeal, finding that in light of its waiver of its RAND licence rights, declaratory relief to determine the scope and terms of the licence which TQD was bound to offer to the two ZyXEL parties would no longer serve a useful purpose. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:02 am by Jeff Foust
There’s no evidence that this proposed ban has gone anywhere, and officials with United Launch Alliance (ULA), which builds the Atlas V, sound unconcerned. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
In the context of a dispute concerning whether or not a given royalty is [F]RAND, a proper methodology used to determine a [F]RAND royalty should therefore recognize and seek to mitigate the risk of patent hold-up that [F]RAND commitments are intended to avoid."" [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:46 am by Mark Summerfield
In the most recent decision relating to the CSIRO Wi-Fi patent, a US Federal Court Judge in the Eastern District of Texas has ordered networking equipment manufacturer Cisco Systems, Inc, to pay the Australian research organisation US$16,243,069 (plus interest) in damages for infringements dating back to 2005. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
Another amicus curiae brief has been filed in connection with Google's appeal of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
The machine-to-transformation is not, according to the US Supreme Court, the only definitive test, but more of "...a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under §101".Gavin always thought in the abstractThe majority's decision hinged heavily on its previous decisions of Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]