Search for: "US v. Richard Carter" Results 21 - 40 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:50 am
Carter and Richard Sleeman concluded that there is no meaningful relationship between where a bill came from and the type or amount of drug residue on it. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Cliff Richard case continues to dominate the media law news. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
At the ABA Journal, Terry Carter and James Podgers report on how the Court’s 2009 decision in Caperton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:11 am by Walter Olson
Levine (20) The Roberts Court and Liability Reform (0) The frivolous side of Funny Cide (4) Richard Epstein on Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am by Amy Howe
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Open access for University College of London research product (1709 Copyright Blog) Research by Bournemouth University and FremantleMedia ‘The exploitation of television formats: intellectual property and non-law based strategies (1709 Copyright Blog) Virgin Media, Universal Music team up to offer UK unlimited music (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Osgoode) SCRIPT establishes IP Foresight Forum to discuss IP and media law and policy development (IPKat) United… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form. [read post]