Search for: "US v. Vargas" Results 21 - 40 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2015, 11:07 am
By having separate firms owning the tractors and the trailers, they attempt to shield themselves under the Graves Amendment -- federal law written to protect rental car companies from renters' negligence but which truck companies have used to their advantage. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The recently issued opinion of the United States Tax Court in Martignon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Summary of Decision issued February 25, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Vargas Limited Partnership v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Cabreja v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
Vargas never saw anyone besides [Diaz] using the computer. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:28 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Olivia Vargas, an 81-year-old plaintiff who used a walker claimed she was injured when she went to a hospital facility. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:47 am
Veronika Szeghalmi, The Definition of the Right to Privacy in the United States of America and Europe Martha Bradley & Annelize Nienaber, The Use of Drones for Cross-Border Law Enforcement and Military Purposes in Another State’s Sovereign Airspace: A Legal Analysis [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:15 pm by Josh Richman
” CJA Senior Staff Attorney Claret Vargas stated, “This lawsuit shows the very real human rights violations that can occur when former U.S. intelligence and military officials sell their knowledge and services to foreign oppressive regimes, which use these tools to carry out their repressive policies. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:26 pm by Orin Kerr
Vargas reminds me of a question that has come up in Fourth Amendment circles after the Supreme Court’s 2012 GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
In what looks to be a long and thoughtful opinion, the Third Circuit today in US v. [read post]