Search for: "USA v. Alexander"
Results 21 - 40
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2024, 4:29 am
The district court properly exercised its discretion because evidence showed that Avco’s purchases of AVStar’s infringing products were motivated by reasons other than use of infringing trademarks, and Precision provided no evidence to support exemplary remedies (Avco Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:14 am
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:39 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:19 am
Justice Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Sotomayor, expressed strong disagreement with the majority’s interpretation of Section 315(b) as “another step down the road of ceding core judicial powers to agency officials and leaving the disposition of private rights and liberties to bureaucratic mercy” (Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 8:00 am
The attorney fees award was vacated because the district court abused its discretion, lacking sufficient evidence of Axis’s improper litigation conduct (Appliance Liquidation Outlet, L.L.C. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 7:48 am
Furthermore, the appellate court reiterated that financial difficulties and litigation do not excuse nonuse or toll the running of the nonuse period (To-Ricos, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:07 am
Immortalana Inc., 158 A.D.3d 576, 577 (1st Dep’t 2018); Macquarie Capital (USA) v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Alexander Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0299p.06 2008/08/18 Jerman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
In Evenwel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 718. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:31 pm
Sattler), and Alexander BinzelCorporation (Binzel-USA) (collectively, Appellees). [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
Santander Consumer USA Inc., 582 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
(Blacklock's Reporter) v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
DEAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
For the reasons that follow, we will AFFIRM the portion of the dismissal that found there was no subject matter jurisdiction and REVERSE the portion of the dismissal which decided Wagenknecht's claims on the merits. 07a0470p.06 USA v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 795 n.5 (1989); see also Alexander v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
USA Today: Arias lawyers want Twitter accounts of new jurors [read post]
