Search for: "USA v. Martin"
Results 21 - 40
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:07 am
Circuit Judge O’Malley filed a dissenting opinion (Biogen International GmbH v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:42 pm
USA (ND Ind., James T. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:49 am
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio handed down an opinion this week in Adams v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:27 pm
” Coolidge v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Martin Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0669n.06 Roger Estill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0105p.06 2007/03/20 USA v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:31 am
On Trayvon Martin Shooter of unarmed Florida teen gets second lawyer {Reuters} Trayvon Martin case: Inquiry into Stand Your Ground law launched in Florida {Christian Science Monitor} Poll regarding Trayvon Martin’s killing shows racial divide {USA Today} POTUS & SCOTUS AG Eric Holder to 5th Circuit: We’re aware of Marbury v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Childs & USA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:46 am
(d/b/a Homedics-USA, Inc.), Case No. 1:08-cv-00641 (N.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 7:36 am
Padilla v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
" (Emphasis was in the original).Now, I saw in the electronic docket for USA v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 5:39 pm
Per Boccard USA Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:08 am
MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:35 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: SC18961 - Robbins v. [read post]
