Search for: "USA v. Philip Mark" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
For this blog, Mark Walsh offers an eyewitness account of the arguments. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “if the justices don’t reach a final conclusion” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews one of tomorrow’s cases, Kelly v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
, (IMPACT), (IPR-Helpdesk), (I/PUpdates), New OHIM guidelines on opposition, cancellation and international marks: (CATCH US IF YOU CAN!!!) [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
(Blog@IPR::JUR), OHIM refused to register mark WinDVD Creator, since it was descriptive. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
At MarketWatch, Mark H. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch)       Global – Trade Marks / Brands   Trade mark marking strategy - R… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage of Wayfair comes from Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Brent Kendall and Richard Rubin for The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Lisa Soronen looks at the case for the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The most recent case the Supreme Court has decided on the issue of the constitutionality of punitive damages is Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The argument is insufficient to satisfy [the legal] requirement that a plaintiff demonstrate a safer alternative design.Id. at *7 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Duggan and Connor Grant-Knight have a preview for Cornell. [read post]