Search for: "USA v. Rose Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
When a cable news show staffs its “panel of experts” to discuss these cases solely with political reporters and pundits, they are missing the mark. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
” Additional coverage comes from USA Today, the New York Times and The Hill. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
According to Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, the event was closed to media. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
USA, Inc., 566 F.3d 989, 993 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court reached a decision in Bond v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:25 am
His retaliation claim also failed because he could not show a causal link between his termination and his discrimination complaint a year earlier (Hnin v TOA (USA), LLC, May 5, 2014, St. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
The criticism that copyright is a “monopoly” is often bandied about. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
Sept. 1, 2010) (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Acuff-Rose case that Mr. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In the circumstances, we award him full marks for this answer. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
This week’s filings in the challenges to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act – which Lyle covered here and here – generated coverage from Joan Biskupic of the USA Today, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc., ___ S.W.3d ___, 2011 WL 478601, at *?? [read post]
