Search for: "Ublish"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
[The court then endorsed the reasoning of two past Georgia Court of Appeals cases, concluding: -EV] “[P]ublishing or discussing a person’s medical condition with others obviously does not constitute … contacting that person[]” … [Likewise,] posting about [one’s] ex-wife on the Internet — posts that the ex-wife discovered only as a result of searching for her name on the Internet — did not amount to the defendant “getting in touch with… [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
Fiction is by definition untrue and “[p]ublishing a fictitious work about a real person cannot mean the author, by virtue of writing fiction, has acted with actual malice. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:02 am
[Principe] moves the Court to enjoin Curry from "[c]ontacting [Principe], either directly or indirectly, by any means, including but not limited to, by telephone, mail, email, social media, or other electronic means"; from "[p]ublishing [Principe's] name in any media whatsoever"; and from "[c]ontacting any of [Principe's] known business associates concerning [Principe] in any manner or with respect to any topic concerning [Principe]. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am
Fiction is by definition untrue and “[p]ublishing a fictitious work about a real person cannot mean the author, by virtue of writing fiction, has acted with actual malice. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
Fiction is by definition untrue and “[p]ublishing a fictitious work about a real person cannot mean the author, by virtue of writing fiction, has acted with actual malice. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:52 am
” Thus, “[p]ublishing a fictitious work about a real person cannot mean the author, by virtue of writing fiction, has acted with actual malice. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:42 pm
Instead, the new Clause 4.3 states that ‘[p]ublishers must not encourage hatred or abuse against any group based on their characteristics’ (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
The future of “controlled digital lending” is in doubt after a court rules that the Internet Archive’s online library is not protected by fair use. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Model Mayhem is a “publisher or speaker” of third party content and this is the but-for cause of her injury, but: [p]ublishing activity is a but-for cause of just about everything Model Mayhem is involved in. [read post]
