Search for: "Underhill v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
Underhill, 5 How. 1 (1846); The Incandescent Lamp Patent, 159 U. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v HK (Turkey) [2010] EWCA Civ 583 (27th May 2010) Haugesund Kommune & Anor v Depfa ACS Bank [2010] EWCA Civ 579 (27 May 2010) Varsani v Relfo Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 560 (27 May 2010) Egal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 584 (27 May 2010) Kookmin Bank v Rainy Sky SA & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 582 (27 May… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 1 February 2021 Underhill LJ ordered that the hearing should take place if possible between 15 and 31 March 2021. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
The Court of Appeals strikes down the law under the Equal Protection Clause.The case is Dandamudi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm
The Court of Appeals says the trial court was wrong and defendant's counsel cannot argue jury nullification.The case is United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:02 am
Indeed, the California Supreme Court expressly stated in Thomson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
As suggested here, Wood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
Striking another blow against the strategic use of peremptory challenges, the Second Circuit upheld the "blind strike" method of jury selection in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
The Council moved Mrs Watts to a new home which was only three miles from Underhill House. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:29 am
These days, the answer is No.The case is McKithen v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
Underhill LJ gave a concurring judgment, specifically agreeing with [82] and [84]. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
On 25 March 2021 the Court of Appeal (Underhill and Dingemans LJJ) handed down judgment ([2021] EWCA Civ 423 [pdf]), refusing Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal against Nicol J’s dismissal of his libel claim against the Sun. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
While the groundbreaking decision in Fabian v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
This false representation must have a part in the purchaser's decision to buy.Richards and Underhill LJJ agreed with Kitchin LJ, although Underhill LJ noted: "I am bound to say that I regard this case as close to the borderline. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court faced this question in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
The Supreme Court said in Underhill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
LJ Underhill agreed that these issues warranted consideration by the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:47 am
Under EEOC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
