Search for: "Union Pacific Railroad Company, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Union Pacific Railroad Co., ARB No. 13-042, ALJ No. 2012-FRS-17 (ARB Mar. 20, 2015). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Inc., ARB No. 13-074, ALJ No. 2005-ERA-006, slip op. at 12 (ARB Apr. 25, 2014), but that the ALJ had analyzed the case using MSPB authority that used analysis like that in Speegle. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Department of Transportation (DOT) announced with its agencies, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), a package of targeted actions that will address some of the issues identified in recent train accidents involving crude oil and ethanol shipped by rail. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:37 pm by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
Peters, which was a subcontractor for Union Pacific Railroad on the project. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:10 am
TransitAmerica was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit in addition to Union Pacific Railroad Company, which also uses the track where this injury at work took place. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that appellants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Railroads) formerly maintained railroad tracks on a parcel of land in Stockton, California, that was contaminated by petroleum. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
  See University Mechanical and Engineering Contractors, Inc., No. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
Mohawk was the first opinion issued in the High Court’s new term and it was also the first opinion written by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor (December 8, 2010).Union Pacific RR. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
Regal-Beloit Corp.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 2010 WL 298387 (Cal. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Under the settlement, the railroad will pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, which included the discharge of tons of chlorine from a derailed train tank car and thousands of gallons of diesel fuel from ruptured locomotive engine fuel tanks. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
Regal-Beloit Corporation; Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]