Search for: "United States v. Cooper" Results 21 - 40 of 4,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
State coordination and cooperation problems are precisely the areas where federal intervention is most warranted. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Md. 2023),  available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/usv-cargill-meat-solutions-corp-et-al. [6] United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Essay reveals the intersection of the Court’s pretext and excessive force doctrines by unearthing their shared roots in the 1973 United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
       ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
AUSTRAC also co-hosted a Pacific Financial Intelligence Community meeting and provided the Cook Islands Financial Intelligence Unit with a new TAIPAN data analytics system. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]