Search for: "United States v. Dow"
Results 21 - 40
of 529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump began on 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to writer, E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump is set to begin on Tuesday 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 13 December 2023, there was a hearing of an application for strike out in the data protection case of Pacini v Dow Jones before HHJ Parkes KC. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
United States, Case No. 1:16-cv-00745-PLF, is pending in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:07 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization one year ago overturned 50 years of legal precedent protecting the constitutional right to abortion in the United States, leaving the question of whether and how to regulate abortion to individual states. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
United States, 870 F. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
” Dow Chem.Co. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
(D.); VillaromanR. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]
