Search for: "United States v. Schneiderman"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
The Justices have not yet determined whether they will take up the petition for certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Both the United States and Brazil have recently taken clear positions on the laws that regulate merchants charging different amounts for goods depending on the method of payment. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost discusses Turner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm
Canada and United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:18 am
* Matera v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am
” Briefly: At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen summarizes the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
Abbasi) (January 18; granted October 11): Whether lawsuits by Middle Eastern men, who were present in the United States illegally when they were arrested and detained for immigration violations after the September 11 attacks, against government officials can go forward, when the lawsuits allege that the officials knew that “they were subjecting individuals with no ties to terrorism to unnecessary and punitive conditions of confinement. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
United States, which upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, “as ‘good law,’ or ‘technically still on the books,’’’ stating: “No decent person can view the internment as any kind of ‘precedent’ for acceptable government behavior. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
United States; she highlights two cases before the court this term, Lynch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 3:37 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
Schneiderman. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
Dimaya: Whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
