Search for: "United States v. Stock"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
EPA, the Court wiped out federal protections under the Clean Water Act for as much as half of the remaining wetlands in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
In Bates et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
The other justices united around that view. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
In November, the justices heard United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am
Principal place of business and, if that address is not in the United States, the primary location of the company in the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:33 am
There is currently a case being considered by the SJC, Freiner v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The better-reasoned opinions discount allegations where they lack independent corroboration or verification citing a short-seller’s motivation to drive down the target’s stock price. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
United States (Mar. 27): Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
(“Simry”) was a family-owned real estate corporation with direct ownership and legal title to seven multi-unit residential real properties in Manhattan. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In its brief, the United States tells the Supreme Court that "this case presents a pure question of statutory interpretation: Whether bump stocks satisfy the definition of 'machinegun'…. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
” * United States v. [read post]
