Search for: "United Companies Financial Corp. v. Davis" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Adams Holding Corp Appraisal - Commercial 1 Amir Yerushalmi Vision Real Estate Group Investor / Owner 3 Andrea Leppart Phoenix Realty Group Acquisitions 1 Hezi Torati Torati Holdings Development 3 Anthony Cristi WaMu Lending - Commercial 2 Sajjad Chowdhry Zayan Finance Commercial Financier 2 Chanan Oxenhandler REYA Properties Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Companies will face fines of up to €50m if they persistently fail to remove this illegal content from their sites. [read post]
 Foley is available to assist in interpretation of any of the federal COVID assistance for your business and can help you find ways to claim and/or use available funding for your company. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Ten Network has gone into administration after failing to win financial backing from its leading shareholders. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]