Search for: "United States, et al. v. Lowe, et al."
Results 21 - 40
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
V. et al. (2005). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
In this short paper, we focus on the legal needs of low-income consumers and the potential of LLMs to increase their access to the court system in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Mitchell McCormick, et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
References: American Public Health Association, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:26 am
Facts: This case (United States of America v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., et al., No. 05-300963, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed its long standing decision that a watercraft under construction is not a “vessel in navigation” for purposes of the Jones Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
Zhejiang Yankon Group Co., Ltd et al, 5-14-cv-00881 (CACD April 27, 2015, Order) (Bernal, J.) [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
Some cases also related to travel to Italy.Severi et al., 2015[21]; EFSA 2014[22]; Chiapponi et al., 2014[23]; Rizzo et al., 2013[24]; Guzman-Herrador et al., 2014[25]; Fitzgerald et al., 2014[26]2013165Pomegranate arils (frozen)Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, WisconsinTurkeyUnknownCollier et al., 2014[27]; CDC… [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 pm
., B-401596, et al, Sept. 21, 2009, the GAO sustained a protest against the pre-qualification of a vendor on the grounds that the Department of State’s (DOS) determination that the vendor satisfied the qualification requirements of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (Security Act) was unreasonable. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Societe Bic, S.A. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – April 12th, 2018) involves a trademark infringement action. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:31 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in federal court (State of New York v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Americare Sys. et al., 397 S. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Rev. 349 (2005) [hereinafter, “Schwartz, et al. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
Wednesday in Reed Elsevier Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Phase 4 Films, Inc. et al, 2:13-cv-09401, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
The Court upheld the law’s individual mandate in 2012 in National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
