Search for: "United States of America, Appellant, v. S & a Company, Appellee" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 3:27 am by Jon Gelman
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Defendant-Appellant the Government of the Russian Federation ("Russia") appeals from the district court's order absolving Plaintiff-Appellee the United States of America ("United States") of all potential liability with respect to certain isotopes. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
§141(c) states “[a] party to an inter partes review or a post-grant review who is dissatisfied with the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board [] may appeal the Board’s decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:12 pm
§ 141(c) (“A party to . . . a post-grant review who is dissatisfied with the final written decision of the [PTAB] . . . may appeal the [PTAB’s] decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 5:42 am
Oct. 10, 2006):Plaintiff-appellant Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada ("RSA") seeks damages from defendants-appellees Century International Arms, Inc. and Century Arms, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITConstitutional LawDNA Act Does Not Violate Fourth Amendment When Applied to Convicted Felons Sentenced to Probation United States of America, appellee v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeFraud Conspiracy Action, Based on False Statements To Medicare Agents, Remanded for Resentencing United States, appellant v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
("Ford") and its cargo insurer, Royal Insurance Co. of America ("Royal") (collectively, "Appellants"), brought this action against Defendant-Appellee Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Amicus Curiae Brief Of The United States Of America, Dowhal v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court has granted a petition to hear the controversial case of American Electric Power Company Inc., et al., Petitioners v. [read post]