Search for: "United States of America v. Garrett" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Brandon Garrett urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
For The Atlantic, Garrett Epps explains why the “whole travel-ban episode,” now on the justices’ merits docket as Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, holding that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Steve Gottlieb
But on the floor a motion was made to make the point indisputable: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]