Search for: "United States of America v. Sanders" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have upheld them in… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded that the bill “confiscates every American’s private health insurance” and that “America will never be a socialist country. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 As Schleicher notes, Vermont has a smaller population than 28 cities in the United States (including Austin, Texas, whose metropolitan area is approximately three times the population of Vermont) and 107 counties. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The precise meaning of this normative America is somehow hidden beneath the surface of politics, encoded in a message from the past. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Bain, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for amici Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition; Commercial Internet Exchange; Computer & Communications Industry Association; Information Technology Association of America; Netcoalition.com; United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New Jersey Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Steven Sanders discusses Beckles v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
In this regard paper refers to established mediation practices that can be found in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and also Greece, with its recent introduction of mediation. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]