Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE CONSISTING OF 2 DEVICES, ETC." Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Dennis Crouch
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Rules from Bruen Further analysis of the material in this Part is in my article Restoring the right to bear arms: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm by Thomas James
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm by Thomas James
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
And it is most fully formed when states—the fundamental political body corporate—reconstitute parts of itself as an economic body corporate to engage in activities in national and transnational markets.[2] The conduct of economic activities through state owned enterprises (SOEs) function in the space where public duty and private obligation meet, that is, where the legal duties of the state merge with the governance responsibilities of the private… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The relevance of Bărbulescu to home working and the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 2/2017 Arguably more helpful guidance on the issue is provided by Bărbulescu and the (now disbanded) Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am by Florian Mueller
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
The MDL Panel consists of seven United States District and Circuit Court Judges (each serving a seven-year term), including its Chairman. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
The MDL Panel consists of seven United States District and Circuit Court Judges (each serving a seven-year term), including its Chairman. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
Indeed, those means often will be the exact same: a particular exploit providing access to an enemy device, network, etc. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
 (For more on the complexities associated with weapons review for cyber capabilities, see this recent article in International Law Studies by Jeffrey Biller and Mike Schmitt.) 3. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Florian Mueller
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 had an occasion to comprehensively deal with the scope and ambit of the concept of anticipatory bail. [read post]